On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote: > [Yes, I'm aware of the counterargument that "defaults" *might* mean > another rule of lower power *might* be able to change it, but an > equal reading is "defaults" in this context might mean that if it is > not set at the time of submission, this is what it is, YMMV].
Speaking of which, do we have a precedent that "essential parameters" of a decision, once initiated, can change during the voting process? (given the first paragraph of r107). I'm aware that this would break democritization as well if it were not true. I remember discussion but can't remember if there was a case about it. -G.
