On Sat, 14 Feb 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > Except that rule 754 concerns "terminology and grammar." I would consider > those to refer to the selection and definition of words, not a typo.
There are several precedents in the case log (forgive me for not looking them up right now) that say more or less "if any reasonable person could be able to figure out what it means, and there isn't more than one reasonable interpretation, then it works." Not to say that this might not be made a little clearer in R754, but it probably belongs there instead of fixing typos for the assessor and noone else. -Goethe
