I support both as well. -Yally
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Alex Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:56 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: > > comex wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Charles Reiss <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> GUILTY / APOLOGY (empty set). > > >> GUILTY / APOLOGY - exception, batch, late, docket, 2200, 2202, 2203. > > > > > > I intend with 2 support to appeal the questions on sentencing in CFJs > > > 2373 and 2375, on the grounds that failing to assign judges to some > > > old cases does not deserve a formal apology unless someone > > > demonstrates that they were actually disadvantaged by the lateness. > > > > I support both of these. > > > You can just appeal them by announcement, can't you? > -- > ais523 > >
