On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:56 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> comex wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Charles Reiss <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> GUILTY / APOLOGY (empty set).
> >> GUILTY / APOLOGY - exception, batch, late, docket, 2200, 2202, 2203.
> >
> > I intend with 2 support to appeal the questions on sentencing in CFJs
> > 2373 and 2375, on the grounds that failing to assign judges to some
> > old cases does not deserve a formal apology unless someone
> > demonstrates that they were actually disadvantaged by the lateness.
>
> I support both of these.
>
You can just appeal them by announcement, can't you?
--
ais523
