On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, comex wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, comex wrote: >>> However, if everyone was deregistered, even though the same rule would >>> be defining Citizenship, the Power 2-defined 'player' would no longer >>> match the ordinary-language meaning of 'player'. Does this count as >>> enough difference to make the definition void? >> >> I think that with no players, R104 would auto-assert and Michael would >> become the Speaker (and thus a player) of the first game of New Agora. >> >> Good thing we kept that around. > > That wasn't the point. Assume one or two players remained. :P
Ah. In that case, I really think your question won't be testable at all until we have some judicial precedence on where "guidance" rom lower power definitions breaks down (if you're talking about a definition "transitioning" from leaning one way to leaning another, it's so specific to case it's hard to know). -G.
