On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, comex wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: >> I apologize if this is so. When you denied and posted the 'did not', >> 'did too', I assumed you were acknowledging that the statement >> "Rule 2238 is a Power=3 rule" to BUS was meant to be a self-ratifying >> statement from the rulekeepor disguised (initially) as musings; I >> was guided by your recent specific use of the R2201(b) for the same >> scam. Please understand my paranoia, but if I can get an independent >> assessment (anyone else?) that your statement has no danger, I'll >> apologize again... :) > > Oh, it was a scam and you broke it, just for the wrong reason: I was > going to declare it self-ratifying a few minutes before seven days > after it was published. :) Ah well, we'll see how the other CFJ goes.
I'm blind right now... which rule allows that? [And if you claim it again, I'll hit ya with a misleading... ;)] -G.
