OscarMeyr wrote:
> So your intended judgment summarizes as:
>
> * The fine is int(Rule Power) which in this case evaluates to 1 Rest.
> * With the proper phrasing and support, the fine can be int(2 * Rule
> Power), which would evaluate to 3 Rests.
>
> What phrasing do you recommend?
Here's my attempt:
* SILENCE. When in effect, a number of Rests are created in the
possession of the Ninny. If the Ninny showed bad faith by
contesting an obviously-correct notice or by obstructing the
course of justice, the judge CAN and SHOULD with 2 support
declare the fine doubled when delivering sentence. The amount
of the fine is equal to the defined Class of the Crime or (if
the breach is not a defined crime) the power of the breached
Rule, doubled if the judge declared such as noted above, then
rounded down to the nearest integer.