2009/1/8, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk>:
>
> I submit a proposal (AI=1, II=0, Title="Paradoxical Dancing"), with the
> text {{{Create a power-1 rule with the text {{Wooble SHALL NOT Dance a
> Powerful Dance. Neither sentence of this rule has an effect.}}.}}}
>
> I call for judgement on the statement {{{If a rule were created with the
> text {{Wooble SHALL NOT Dance a Powerful Dance. Neither sentence of this
> rule has an effect.}}, then it would be ILLEGAL for Wooble to Dance a
> Powerful Dance.}}}
>
> Arguments: If the rule in question existed, then this would be a clear
> Epinemedes Paradox. The paradox rules specifically allow for
> hypothetical paradoxes; and the judgement is not irrelevant to the game
> (for instance, Wooble might be planning to Dance a Powerful Dance in the
> future, and would probably want to vote AGAINST the proposal I just
> submitted if it did indeed restrict em from doing so).
> --
> ais523
>
>
He just can't Dance a Powerful Dance to the business list. It's kind of hard
to dance to (on) a public forum anyway.For those not playing B: We had a recent contract scam saying that any player other than comex breathing was explicit consent for them to join a contract causing them to deregister, which was correctly overruled because no player had breathed to a public forum. -- w1n5t0n aka Charles Schaefer
