On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 16:15, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> It's >> ambiguous whether "deregistration" or "degregistration" was meant, so >> the last paragraph of Rule 2197 prevents it from having any effect >> (contract-related or otherwise). > > Gratuitous argument: R101 takes precedence over R2197 (and the rest of > the ruleset, pretty much); no interpretation of the rules can deprive > a player of eir right to cease to be a player. Interpreting a typo to > deprive one of ones rights would be a particularly bad interpretation. > Argument: Ehird has made multiple attempts to deregister though until this attempt e has failed to send them to the appropriate forum. It is clear e desires to leave the game, and R101 should permit such a player to do so even if e is incapable of drafting a proper deregistration message after multiple attempts.
BobTHJ
