On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > It's > ambiguous whether "deregistration" or "degregistration" was meant, so > the last paragraph of Rule 2197 prevents it from having any effect > (contract-related or otherwise).
Gratuitous argument: R101 takes precedence over R2197 (and the rest of the ruleset, pretty much); no interpretation of the rules can deprive a player of eir right to cease to be a player. Interpreting a typo to deprive one of ones rights would be a particularly bad interpretation.