Warrigal wrote: > On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Elliott Hird > <penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On 26 Dec 2008, at 00:03, Warrigal wrote: >>> Your opinion would matter more if you were a player of DiploNomic. >> As it purports to be a changing Agoran contract, my opinion is very >> relevant. > > DiploNomic can interpret itself however it wants. The only question is > whether DiploNomic and the Agoran contract are the same thing. > > Can you come up with an actual reason (one supported by game custom, > common sense, past judgements, or consideration of the best interests > of the game) that DiploNomic's "arbitrary proposals can take effect" > does not entail "arbitrary changes can happen"?
Particularly since the changes were announced, as required for changes to public contracts.
