Goethe wrote: > On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >>>> I agree to the following public contract. I announce my intent >>>> to make it a Contest w/o three objections and with myself as >>>> contestmaster (oh crud this will hit the holiday, no contestifying?) >>> As I read the Holidays rule and the dependent action rules, it's still >>> possible to resolve dependent actions during the Holiday. >> Disagree; the time limits for objections and resolution are both >> extended to January 8, making it effectively impossible. This can >> be fixed by re-submitting intent on or after December 25. > > Arguably, holidays talk about the time of a future event, and > Dependent actions talk about the time of a prior event. Look > at both rules, the difference seems non-trivial (e.g. phrasing > is outside common synonyms). And what would this time of year > be without our annual Holiday Timing Controversy? -G.
I think R1728(b) reasonably fits R1769's "time limit to perform an action". (Wooble is right, though, objections don't have a separate time limit.)
