On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I zoop a criminal case against the PerlNomic Partnership for violating > Rule 2215 by announcing that I am a party to it in the quoted message.
I intend, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal CFJ against Warrigal for violating R2215 in the above-quoted message by claiming not to be a party to the PerlNomic partnership. Warrigal has repeatedly shown knowledge that the PerlNomic metarules include a provision that by playing the game one agrees to be bound by the PNP contract, and with this foreknowledge e registered as a PerlNomic player and continued to take actions that caused em to be an Active Player as defined by PerlNomic's internal state. This combination of factors constitutes an explicit willful agreement into the PNP contract, eir claims to the contrary notwithstanding. It should be noted that there's a mechanism e can use to become inactive in PerlNomic and thus not bound by the contract, and that e's both used that mechanism recently and shown detailed knowledge of its inner workings in the ##nomic discussion forum. E can also vote for a pending PerlNomic proposal to permanently expel em from the game. --Wooble
