comex wrote: > Because it means that SHALLs are ignored. Since the with 2 support > requirement was added, in several months, only three people have been > found GUILTY of anything, one of which was a partnership: out of > these, only ehird was actually punished (for Phill). Each of the > other two cases included a sentence of APOLOGY, which the ninny > blatantly ignored.
Then initiate criminal cases for failure to apologize. I'll support. > anyone can-- and > people do-- get away with minor but intentional Rule violations > because nobody cares enough to gather support and punish them. Again, bring back Infractions. (Yes, ais523's proto, but that brings up another issue that was observed several years back: one way to delay progress in a given area is to float a proto and then fail to submit it as a proposal.) > Proto-proto: Abolish the pre-trial period. It delays criminal and > equity cases excessively, especially the latter because it's rarely > ended early; the judge can solicit defenses as necessary. AGAINST. Controversial cases benefit from the pre-trial period, and uncontroversial cases should go through a more lightweight system.
