On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, comex wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 3. The instant-reflexive CFJ was just being used when two people were >> annoyed at each other. If this passes I shall prove my point. I believe >> I have 5 CFJs permitted per week? And I won't need support to call criminal >> cases? And an "allegation" can technically include false statements without >> worry (after all, an allegation is not a claim of truth)? This might be fun. > > Uh, except you're forbidden from making false allegations by the same > proposal?
I expect to enjoy the court cases resulting.
