On 21/11/2008, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Elliott Hird > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 20 Nov 2008, at 23:44, Ed Murphy wrote: >> >>> Did you attempt to use your scam powers to take yourself out of >>> the chokey? Such an attempt would have failed if your original >>> in-the-chokey status kept your voting limits below 51. >> >> /me drops bomb of crap gamestate >> >> crim cfjs have to specify the message in which the act occurred. >> >> nobody does this. the one against me didn't. >> >> chokey is not pragmatised; other punishments are. >> >> i did not know this until recently. another punishment would be >> unjust. :) > > Sure it did. It was the message from tusho consisting of "publishing > a message purportedly from > "phill" and registering as a player". I have records of only one such > message, so I think the indication was clear. > > -root >
It was not explicitly specified, as required.
