Pavitra wrote: >> * There was a period lasting at least 4 days during which the >> person was aware of or could easily have found out that an >> attempt or intent to make that amendment was being made, >> and could have ceased to agree to the document in question >> during that time, with such ceasing to agree requiring no >> effort beyond sending a message with no side-effects other >> than the ceasing to agree itself. > This would horribly break contracts that define assets whose ownership > is restricted to parties.
No, it would just transfer their assets to the Lost and Found Department (assuming that that clause was retained).
