On Monday 20 October 2008 06:49:17 pm Kerim Aydin wrote: > avpx: > There once was a man from Agora > who replied not to the public fora. > His votes were submitted, > but his say was omitted, > though his ballots were cast in plethora. Applause!
> ehird: > (b) A Patent Title herein is ordained: > We name it "Bard", and grant it those with wit. > In order for the Title to be gained, > A level of Support must call for it. > > Three players to a fourth may grant the name > If three shall write as one with two Support. > A current Bard may also grant the same > Provided that a second Bard's a sport. > > So that we don't the name of Bard debase: > With three Support, a Player can conspire > To (from a Bard) this Title to erase; > Or Bards in triplicate a Bard retire. > > But lest we ruin some poor minstrel's fun, > E CANNOT be dis-bard for awful pun. Boo! for, indeed, this is base plagiarism. > Wooble: > I say I do, therefore I do. > Don't quote to me your refuting rules, > Though CFJs do not come back TRUE, > I say I do, therefore I do. > It works for me, it will work for you > The judges and officers all are fools. > I say I do, therefore I do, > don't quote to me your refuting rules. Applause! > Murphy: > How slow is triple unanimity! > That lofty goal of undisputed truth > That three must reach in no more time than one. > And so the order handed down to me: > Recuse the lot if they be so uncouth > That none persuade the rest before the gun. > But I was lost, the cases like a sea; > Extended kindness, as if to a youth > And gave them extra time to judge and run. > Apologies, I register a plea: > No fun. Applause! > Pavitra: > O Protean Game, amended oft > (In fits by law, in starts by scam), > Thy glories Bard-prais'd, loud or soft, > In many keys -- how glad I am > To say this day, of all the year, > (Occasion'd thy nativity,) > To Public Forum, all to hear: > Happy Birthday! (Ribbon me.) Silence! for, indeed, 'twould be corruptive self-interest. Pavitra
