On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Goethe wrote: >> >>> Append the following sentence to R2202: >>> A player SHALL NOT ratify nor support the ratification >>> of a report e knows to be false. >> >> This criminalizes ratification to patch over errors that no one is >> much interested in fixing another way. In such cases, the defendant >> /could/ get away with no one bothering to initiate a criminal case, >> or with the judge selecting DISCHARGE, but still. > > I'm not particularly fond of that practice anyway. Usually, an entire > report is ratified, which fixes the particular thing we're interested > in but could also ratify additional errors.
I had pretty nearly this same discussion inside my head while writing it. No strong opinion, so I'll let voters decide. One compromise would be that if e knows something to be false, e must point it out in the notice of intent. -G.
