On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 08:26 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, Toughen Ratifiation, AI-3:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [Ratification has been the source of scams lately. Too much traffic
> to check all reports well. Thus, some safety. Require a supporter
> as a way of saying "yes I also think ratification is needed and I've
> looked at the report too". Also, note that ratification used to be
> much rarer without breaking the game]
>
> Amend R2202 to be titled "Official Ratification"
>
> Amend R2202 by replacing "without objection" with "without objection
> and with support".
>
> Append the following sentence to R2202:
> A player SHALL NOT ratify nor support the ratification
> of a report e knows to be false.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
I think you should probably also make ratification self-ratifying; that
is, ratifications self-ratify as having worked. Otherwise, we could end
up in meta-ratification mixups...
--
ais523
