On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, ais523 wrote: > Hmm... I support this. Ideally I'd like an appeals panel to look at it > and AFFIRM the judgement, so that it's been looked at by someone who > isn't interested, but if I end up on the appeals panel I'll be > REASSIGNing for obvious reasons. I think the judgement is correct, > though, and suspect a new judge will agree with me.
Yeah, I agree that an AFFIRM would be fine and fair as long as the justices wrote that they took a good look at it and agreed. -Goethe
