On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 13:01 -0700, Charles Reiss wrote:
> I assume you're arguing then, that your purported monster-deputisation
> to assign that ID number was ineffective?
From Rule 1607:
{{{
Distributed proposals have ID numbers, to be assigned by the
Promotor.
}}}The distribution by the Monster was ineffective (I think we're all agreed on that), so the Monster's attempt to assign an ID number to the proposal in question failed due to it not being distributed at the time. -- ais523
