On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 10:17 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: > > Voting results for Proposals 5732 - 5733: > > > > [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the > > following proposals. For each decision, the options available to > > Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!).] > > Claim of Error: There was insufficient information published during > the voting period to determine what my own conditional vote of > TETRAHERDON resolved to. I did not pre-agree or agree at all that it > would involve a pledge or contract of any kind.
I agree with Goethe on this; I don't think anyone else created a pledge by voting TETRAHEDRON due to rule 101 (and possibly for other reasons too). As a result, I think it's impossible to tell what some of the votes are without knowing who I told the meaning of TETRAHEDRON in advance, and I didn't publish that information during the voting period; this may mean that some of the votes are invalid altogether. -- ais523
