On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, ehird wrote: > On 8 Oct 2008, at 18:17, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: >>> Voting results for Proposals 5732 - 5733: >>> >>> [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the >>> following proposals. For each decision, the options available to >>> Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!).] >> >> Claim of Error: There was insufficient information published during >> the voting period to determine what my own conditional vote of >> TETRAHERDON resolved to. I did not pre-agree or agree at all that it >> would involve a pledge or contract of any kind. >> > The contract was published in the voting period.
But not the fact of my agreement to it, which needed to be explicit. If I'd explicitly said that I expected TETRAHEDRON to be a contract of some kind and that I pre-agreed, that would have been enough, but I didn't say that during the voting period. -Goethe
