On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, ehird wrote: > On 6 Oct 2008, at 17:32, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> And "alternate" recordkeepors would be free to track entirely different >> versions of the same records. That's what unregulated means. >> >> -Goethe > > This proposal is based on the most important rule in the ones left: custom. > > It retains the entire ruleset via custom.
And strong custom holds that unregulated is unregulated. Does this single huge custom then make all the other customs break down when they are deregulated? I'd say so. -Goethe
