On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, ihope wrote: > Rule 101, "Agoran Rights and Privileges", makes reference to persons, > binding agreements, Agoran law, rules, players, regulation, formal > processes to resolve matters of controversy, judicial determinations, > fora, and deregistration, implying that these qualities are still > worth keeping track of. Most importantly, it states that we can still > initiate formal processes to resolve matters of controversy--most > likely, CFJs, as these are what's been used in the past.
No it won't. It will put just about everything in the "unregulated" category, which will have a huge effect on how they're supposed to be managed. Since you keep R101, you keep that "unregulated" concept and then throw everything in that category. There's a huge Rules difference between, on one hand, saying in the Rules that something is regulated, defining it, and then saying that the exact regulation is "loose and based on custom" and this proposal that is making (most things) wholly unregulated. > In addition, officers are free to continue keeping track of what > they've been keeping track of; And "alternate" recordkeepors would be free to track entirely different versions of the same records. That's what unregulated means. -Goethe
