On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:40 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow, I didn't realise that rule existed. Game custom certainly seems to > go against it (all the contracts made recently that were intended to > allow arbitrary persons to join have explicitly allowed that, I think). > > Does this open up a scam where you can get rid of any pledge with the > help of a friend, by having the friend join the pledge and then amending > it with eir consent to create a get-out clause?
No. That's why change by unanimous consent is based upon the minimum number of parties, not the current number of parties. -root
