On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, comex wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:15 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> 3. bayes.py is a script whose purpose is to act on behalf of Bayes in >>> a generally autonomous way, controlled by the parties to this >>> contract. >>> 4. bayes.py CAN cause Bayes to act by sending a message from [EMAIL >>> PROTECTED] >> >> How can a non-person act on behalf of a person? > > Although Goethe seems to think that non-persons unilaterally cannot > send messages, scripts are definitely capable of sending messages "on > their own", and I don't know why we should assume the legal fiction > that they can't. Can you suggest a better wording? The PerlNomic > clause:
I didn't say that they could not send messages, I just said that you could always point to a person behind the non-person who triggered the sending. Good luck and proving me wrong with bayes, very interesting! -Goethe
