On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:09 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:05 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 11:02 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
>>> You know, it seems to me that your interpretation of it should more
>>> plausibly be written "SELL (5VP - AGAINST x 3)".
>> Well, does that allow the buying of 1 vote or 3? That isn't at all clear
>> from that.
>
> The Vote Market only allows buying as many votes as the seller has.
> It is impossible to only sell one without a specially engineered sell
> ticket.

Reading the contract again today, I think I agree with you.  It's
clear to me now what happened:

BobTHJ voted "SELL (5VP - AGAINST) x 5".  This amounted to 5 votes of
"SELL (5VP - AGAINST)", which resulted in 5 sets of conditional votes,
each set resolving to (endorse filler x 5 / AGAINST x 1); and 5
corresponding sell tickets.

If we charitably assume that ais523 succeeded in filling the first of
those 5 sell tickets, then BobTHJ's votes were, in order, (endorse
ais523) x 5, AGAINST x 4.  Since BobTHJ's voting limit was 5, the 4
AGAINST votes were invalid, and ais523's first resolution of the
decision was correct.

-root

Reply via email to