root wrote: > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> root wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> 5719 O 1 1.0 comex Raaaaaaaaaaaaaargh! >>>> endorse Bayes x 3 >>> Unfortunately, Bayes wasn't eligible to vote on that proposal. I >>> instead vote (endorse ais523) x 3. >> Ineffective, need to retract the earlier votes first. > > The earlier votes were invalid.
R2127 doesn't stop you from endorsing an ineligible voter, but since it would resolve to "no vote", they probably don't affect the validity of the later votes.
