Ian Kelly wrote: > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The quoted notice is invalid because it lacks information required by >> Rule 107. Specifically, the following information was not provided: >> >> (c) A clear indication of the options available. > > CFJ 1800 (and indirectly 1650 and 1722) set the precedent that if this > is not explicitly specified, then it's implicit in the nature of the > matter to be decided (i.e. whether to adopt a proposal). > > -root
I was not aware of the precedent. I will retract my notice. -- Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) PGP public key available from http://pgp.mit.edu/ PGP Key ID: 0x14B456ED
