On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Murphy wrote: >> I don't see why not. It seems functionally equivalent to saying >> "I intend to vote on this later", and then later voting normally >> (including with a defined-at-the-same-time condition). > Just wait until you see the definition of TETRAHEDRON, then you might change > your mind.
If you're trying to do some sort of combined vote/action like the SELL votes, I expect the vote would be successful (provided the condition is able to be determined one way or another), but the action would not be, for lack of definition. -root
