On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yep, I got the timing wrong, and I've already admitted my mistake. (That's > during or close to the period of time during which emails to [EMAIL > PROTECTED] got held up for random lengths of time and arrived in random > order.) It's still arguable, though, that you can make a conditional vote and > only define what it means later; that's what I'm trying to establish with my > TETRAHEDRON experiment.
Don't be absurd. The meaning of the conditions were not defined after the fact. That text has been in the contract for months. -root
