>>> Quite possibly that would violate R101. >> If it does then so does the 5 CFJ thing > That's why the wording of R101 clause is as it is; if you're told "you > can re-initiate on the same subject next week" then you still have > a reasonable expectation of resolution with minor delay (but still in > reasonable time). I think there's a precedent on that somewhere? > On the other hand, if there's a type of CFJ subject that can be refused > indefinitely, that would violate R101.
"to resolve matters of controversy". Refusal of a CFJ is within 101(iii) if it's not actually controversial.
