On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, comex wrote: > But what about in the context of Rule 2193? As a new amendment, ought > we to let it use archaisms? Or should we interpret "the first game" > as, just, "the game"?
Actually, I'm going to contradict myself. R104 was never altered, therefore the referent of "the first game" is continuous with the past and was never removed, e.g. its definition continues to exist. -Goethe