On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > comex wrote: >> Are we in the first game, or the (number of >>game wins + 1)th game? > > The way Agora has been structured since ?1995, there is no "Nth game", > we're in just "the game". The phrase "the first game", in the context > of R104, has a special meaning, though: it refers to the period from > the inception of Agora until the first win. That's an historical usage, > based on the game structure that existed at the time.
But what about in the context of Rule 2193? As a new amendment, ought we to let it use archaisms? Or should we interpret "the first game" as, just, "the game"?
