On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> There's not even infinitesimal time. > > Hypothetically. But as long as we're redefining timing of events for > Agoran purposes, there's no reason we can't declare time continuous if > we want.
Oh, I meant that there isn't even infinitesimal time between events in the message, not that we can't define infinitesimal time to exist (we have, we've used things like "X happens the instant after this proposal takes effect...") -Goethe
