On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> (reason: "a moment ago" is not consistent with the acts-within-the-same >> message assumption of "simultaneous but sequential"). > > The assumption is somewhat paradoxical. It can be seen as both true > and false that the announcement happened "before" the CFJ. If we take > "a moment ago" to mean "an indefinite, possibly infinitesimal, time in > the past", then it does not seem inconsistent to me.
There's not even infinitesimal time. Something can be "before" in sequence but not "before" in time of submission without being paradoxical. btw. yes I'm mainly just being pedantic.
