On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 13:37 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, ais523 wrote: > > I judge CFJ 2110 as follows: > > > > At the time the CFJ was called, its statement was FALSE. Vote validity > > is evaluated instantaneously (see root's gratuitous arguments and CFJs > > 1959 and 1960), and at the time the CFJ was called the Agoran Decision > > about the proposal in question was Democratic, therefore the same player > > cannot possibly have more than one valid vote on it. (The statement was > > true earlier, during the voting period for instance, but was false at > > the time the CFJ was called). > > Does this mean that the change to democratic can be made after results > are announced (though before self-ratification)? -Goethe
I think vote validity counts at the time that the results are announced. I was interpreting the CFJ statement literally, though, asking whether the votes were valid instantaneously rather than at the time the proposal was assessed. -- ais523
