On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, ais523 wrote: > I judge CFJ 2110 as follows: > > At the time the CFJ was called, its statement was FALSE. Vote validity > is evaluated instantaneously (see root's gratuitous arguments and CFJs > 1959 and 1960), and at the time the CFJ was called the Agoran Decision > about the proposal in question was Democratic, therefore the same player > cannot possibly have more than one valid vote on it. (The statement was > true earlier, during the voting period for instance, but was false at > the time the CFJ was called).
Does this mean that the change to democratic can be made after results are announced (though before self-ratification)? -Goethe
