On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Charles Reiss wrote:
> Proposal: Overturn CFJ 2050
> {{
> comex is a co-author of this proposal.
>
> Set the judgment on the question of veracity in CFJ 2050 to TRUE.
>

Oh this is horrid and unneeded though I agree with the arguments.  
Just CFJ again, there's no reason a new CFJ can't go against 
precedent (as long as it brings up the precedent and says why it
is Wrong).  -Goethe




Reply via email to