On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Charles Reiss wrote: > Proposal: Overturn CFJ 2050 > {{ > comex is a co-author of this proposal. > > Set the judgment on the question of veracity in CFJ 2050 to TRUE. >
Oh this is horrid and unneeded though I agree with the arguments. Just CFJ again, there's no reason a new CFJ can't go against precedent (as long as it brings up the precedent and says why it is Wrong). -Goethe