woggle wrote:
> Proposal: Overturn CFJ 2050
> {{
> comex is a co-author of this proposal.
>
> Set the judgment on the question of veracity in CFJ 2050 to TRUE.
This isn't strictly needed. From Rule 591:
The judgement of the question in an inquiry case, and the
reasoning by which it was reached, SHOULD guide future play
(including future judgements), but do not directly affect the
veracity of the statement.
However, to get the formal record updated, it would be cleaner to
allow a late appeal, e.g. create a rule with this text:
Any player CAN appeal CFJ 2050 by announcement, upon which this
rule is repealed.
Rule 2170 (Who Am I?) should probably also be amended to state that
"X CAN act on behalf of Y" constitutes a legal fiction that Y is the
one acting, and define some useful label for X's role in the matter.
