On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem with that is, under the old system, there were definitely > multiple things called "voting limits". "Effective voting limit on that > decision" and replacing "ordinary decision" with "decision" is probably good > enough...
We could also just update it to explicitly say how many votes it's trying to cast on each decision, and either let players manually update the value (easy, and it could violate the partnership contract to falsify the values), or read the Assessor's report and automatically update it (considerably trickier).
