On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Roger Hicks wrote: > IMHO part of the problem is that of late there has been a glut of > cases that require a lot of work on the part of the judge and have > little value in determining precedent.
One of the worst part of this trend is the sheer sloppiness of (some) callers these days in providing evidence, facts, email trails, etc. Judges should not hesitate to (and IMO should far more often should) slap the callers with CFJ 1771 or (especially) a similar UNDETERMINED null equity judgement to get rid of a case where evidence is not reasonably provided. -Goethe
