On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> In the PNP i believe that the PNP is indeed the Executor of its own
> messages, as it has an e-mail address set up specifically for it, and
> it sends its own messages. I see no reason that partnerships be
Read the definition of Executor:
The Executor of a public message is the first-class person who
sends it, or who most directly and immediately causes it to be
sent. The executor of an action performed by announcement is
the executor of the announcement.
The PNP, by definition, cannot be an executor of anything since it is
not first-class. For all the current ways the PNP sends message there
is usually a clear (if tricky to identify) first-class person who
triggers the script that sends the message (activating a proposal or
running one of the CGI programs directly).
-woggle
