On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 5649 O1 1.7 Quazie Partnerships devolve, and so should unqu... > AGAINST x 17 (should explicitly lift the first-class restriction for > initiating)
I'll fix that then. Also, is the word basis or feet appropriate for what I want to say (i don't remember if your proposal passed/will pass or not) >> 5650 O1 1.7 Pavitra No frivolous prosecution > FOR x 17 >
