On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> You never define P. >>>>> >>>> P is the power of the rule being podded. >>>>> So this is simply a race to see who can pod the most rules as quickly >>>>> as possible? Also, you talk about a contest but you never describe the >>>>> awarding of points anywhere. >>>> Probably destroy a certain number of pods for a point, not sure what >>>> the number should be. >>>>> BobTHJ >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> Maybe it should cost psyducks to pod or support an intent to pod, and >>> first-class players joining the contract for the first time should get >>> a certain amount of psyducks? >>> >> Cost 1 psyduck to pod or support podding. When there is no pod, the >> podder and supporter get 2 psyducks each. First-class players start >> out with 4 psyducks, and get 2 psyducks/week (for example). >> > Actually, such a setup might cause very slight slowdown, because the > initiator would probably have to bribe someone to support em, seeing > as on average, someone who only supports tends to come out even.. >
Maybe rules should be poddable again (for a random amount of pods) $power weeks after they were podded?
