On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2080 >>> >>> ============================== CFJ 2080 ============================== >>> >>> I CFJ on this statement. >>> >>> ======================================================================== >>> >>> Caller: Quazie >>> >>> Judge: Murphy >>> Judgement: >>> >>> ======================================================================== >>> >>> History: >>> >>> Called by Quazie: 15 Jul 2008 20:13:33 GMT >>> Assigned to Murphy: (as of this message) >>> >>> ======================================================================== >>> >>> Caller's Evidence: >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> I CFJ on this statement. >>>> >>>> -root >>>> >>> >>> I CFJ on that statement. >>> >>> ======================================================================== >>> >> >> This CFJ is incorrect. I CFJed on that statement, not this statement. > > The antecedent of "that statement" was clearly the statement "I CFJ on > this statement." > > -root >
Then why does tusho's CFJ of 'I CFJ on the previous statement' remain?
