On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2080
>>
>> ==============================  CFJ 2080  ==============================
>>
>>    I CFJ on this statement.
>>
>> ========================================================================
>>
>> Caller:                                 Quazie
>>
>> Judge:                                  Murphy
>> Judgement:
>>
>> ========================================================================
>>
>> History:
>>
>> Called by Quazie:                       15 Jul 2008 20:13:33 GMT
>> Assigned to Murphy:                     (as of this message)
>>
>> ========================================================================
>>
>> Caller's Evidence:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I CFJ on this statement.
>>>
>>> -root
>>>
>>
>> I CFJ on that statement.
>>
>> ========================================================================
>>
>
> This CFJ is incorrect.  I CFJed on that statement, not this statement.

The antecedent of "that statement" was clearly the statement "I CFJ on
this statement."

-root

Reply via email to