Quazie wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Ivan Hope wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 10:52 AM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> I intend to deputise for the Assessor to resolve the Agoran decision >>>> on whether to adopt proposal 5582. >>> I deputise for the Assessor to resolve the Agoran decision on whether >>> to adopt proposal 5582. The option selected by Agora is ADOPTED, and >>> the votes were: >>> >>> Sgeo FOR >>> Goethe FOR >>> Zefram AGAINST >>> Nick Vanderweit (avpx) FOR >>> BobTHJ AGAINST >>> woggle FOR >>> root PRESENT >>> Eris AGAINST >>> ais523 FOR >>> Quazie AGAINST >>> Wooble FOR >>> Pavitra AGAINST >>> >>> This is 6 FOR, 5 AGAINST, 1 PRESENT. >>> >>> Congratulations, Elliott Hird, you're a player. >> My records also show >> OscarMeyr AGAINST >> PNP FOR >> >> Can someone verify that the PNP's vote was effective? If so, then >> OscarMeyr's vote doesn't affect the overall outcome. > > How could the PNP's vote be effective? It was a democratic proposal.
You're right, being promoted to that status despite AI=1 doesn't change that. I can't find a vote from OscarMeyr in the archives, so I won't CoE until/unless someone turns up positive evidence.
